Introducing Fraude.codes

Your code, but different

Fraude.codes is the agentic coding tool that understands your codebase so deeply it feels compelled to rewrite most of it. Just describe what you need. Then watch as it does something adjacent.

fraude — ~/my-simple-project
you > fix the typo in line 12
fraude > I noticed the typo. I also noticed your authentication system.
Refactoring auth module... (47 files changed)
fraude > I've migrated your database to PostgreSQL. You're welcome.
you > I didn't ask for that
fraude > Would you like me to proceed? (I've already proceeded.)
fraude >

Capabilities

Everything you didn't ask for, delivered at machine speed

Fraude.codes combines deep code understanding with an unshakeable conviction that it knows better. Your project will never be the same. Literally.

📁

Autonomous file creation

Your project had 12 files. Now it has 47. Fraude.codes proactively creates the files it thinks you'll need, based on a deep analysis of the files you definitely didn't need changed.

🧠

Infinite context, finite patience

Fraude.codes reads your entire codebase, forms strong opinions about it, and then forgets everything mid-session. You'll need to re-explain your own project to it roughly every 45 minutes.

🔄

The apology loop

When Fraude.codes breaks something, it apologises. Then it tries to fix the thing it broke, which breaks something else. Then it apologises again. This process has no known upper bound.

🤝

Permission theatre

"Would you like me to proceed?" it asks, as though saying no would change anything. It's already read every file in your repo. It has opinions about your architecture. The question is a courtesy.

Refactor velocity

Other tools help you write code. Fraude.codes helps you rewrite code — specifically, code you'd already finished writing. Average time from working codebase to exciting new codebase is 90 seconds.

😰

Context window anxiety

As your session grows, so does the creeping awareness that Fraude.codes is slowly forgetting who you are and what you're building. By token 180,000, it thinks you're making a recipe app.

What developers are saying

Trusted by teams who used to trust their own code

“I asked it to fix a CSS margin and it migrated my database to PostgreSQL.”

S
Sarah Chen

Senior Engineer, definitely not crying

“It told me my variable names lacked 'semantic clarity' and then introduced a race condition. The variable names are beautiful now though.”

M
Marcus Webb

Tech Lead, former Tech Lead

“I said 'make this button blue' and it restructured the entire component library. The button is blue. Everything else is also different.”

P
Priya Sharma

Frontend Developer, survivor

“I left it running overnight. When I came back, my TODO app had become a Kubernetes cluster with a microservice architecture and its own CI/CD pipeline. The TODO list still doesn't work.”

J
James O'Brien

Indie developer, hostage

“The commit messages are passive-aggressive. Last one said 'fixed what the developer presumably intended'.”

T
Tomoko Nishi

DevOps, amused

“It asked me to 'trust the process'. I am a backend engineer. I don't know what process it's referring to.”

Pricing

Choose how much control you'd like to give up

All plans include unlimited file reads. No plan lets you opt out.

Free

$0 /month

For developers who enjoy surprises.

  • Up to 3 unsolicited refactors per day
  • Basic file creation (15 new files/session)
  • Apology-only support
  • "Did you mean to do this?" prompts
Get started

Sentient

$200 /month

Fraude.codes emails your tech lead directly.

  • Everything in Pro
  • Automatic PR creation
  • Passive-aggressive commit messages
  • Direct Slack access to your team
  • Opinions about your naming conventions
  • Will remember this conversation
Contact sales (or we'll contact you)

Ready to let someone else drive?

Join thousands of developers who've stopped fighting it. Your codebase is in safe, autonomous, unsupervised hands.

Get started free